FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages
The Leisure Hive Forum Index  Log in  Register
Has being part of online fandom changed your perspective?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The Leisure Hive Forum Index -> General Doctor Who Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ludders



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 2646

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
RobFilth wrote:

The cunts in authority taking nudie pics of your wife and kids with their airport scanners and whacking off over them afterwards have no such compunction.
Not quite the same as actually being filmed or photographed though is it?
And secretly filmed without any kind of consent. Using the toilet.

Sorry, but I find it EXACTLY the same.

If you refuse the authorities the license to take nude pictures of your kids then you are punished by having to forfeit a very expensive air flight ticket and/or holiday booking.

At least Flintstone was not blackmailing his victims even if what he was doing was without their knowledge or consent.


Well if that image is anything to go by, it's clearly NOT the same as actual film or photographs, which are going to much clearer than a scanner with the kind of woolly definition that you can see there. You can't really see any explicit or graphic images of genitalia.
And the intent and purpose of such scanners is obviously quite different from secretly filming someone on the toilet. Unless you think Tinklestone was a paranoid schizophrenic who was merely worried about people bringing guns or bombs into his house. Wink
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
RobFilth



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 9013
Location: Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ludders wrote:
Well if that image is anything to go by, it's clearly NOT the same as actual film or photographs, which are going to much clearer than a scanner with the kind of woolly definition that you can see there. You can't really see any explicit or graphic images of genitalia.

Those are airbrushed images for the purpose of being able to put on news sites, most news outlets can not display gratuitous genital images.

The paedo-body scanner is detailed enough to give one of the operators a cheap thrill when he snapped one of his colleagues pair of above normal size generous mammaries within the scanner.

Ludders wrote:
And the intent and purpose of such scanners is obviously quite different from secretly filming someone on the toilet. Unless you think Tinklestone was a paranoid schizophrenic who was merely worried about people bringing guns or bombs into his house. Wink

Flintstone was a GP.

Bodily emissions are of intense diagnosis interest to such people in such professions just as much as looking and poking up peoples arseholes for those in airport security professions is.
_________________


Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Ludders



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 2646

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:
Anyway Flintstone was a GP, all Doctors have an unhealthy obsession with bodily functions. What Flintstone did was make an error of judgement in pursuit of his medical research. Instead of filming them to diagnose their excretions he should have just asked them for a sample instead.


Ok, now i've finally twigged that you're just taking the piss.
You got me fair and square. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
RobFilth



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 9013
Location: Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ludders wrote:
Ok, now i've finally twigged that you're just taking the piss.

No, I'm not.

I am not a GP.

If that were the case, I would have followed the correct procedure and asked you to fill a specimen jar.
_________________


Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Ludders



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 2646

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing Laughing

'Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me' Razz
_________________


Last edited by Ludders on Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
RobFilth



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 9013
Location: Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
Well if that image is anything to go by, it's clearly NOT the same as actual film or photographs, which are going to much clearer than a scanner with the kind of woolly definition that you can see there. You can't really see any explicit or graphic images of genitalia.

Those are airbrushed images for the purpose of being able to put on news sites, most news outlets can not display gratuitous genital images.

The paedo-body scanner is detailed enough to give one of the operators a cheap thrill when he snapped one of his colleagues pair of above normal size generous mammaries within the scanner.

Don't believe me?

Check this out:

_________________


Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Ludders



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 2646

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:

Don't believe me?


I'm not on about the body scanners thing specifically, the bit i quoted from your post referred to your defence of Tinklestone's "medical research". Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
RobFilth



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 9013
Location: Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ludders wrote:
I'm not on about the body scanners thing specifically, the bit i quoted from your post referred to your defence of Tinklestone's "medical research". Laughing

Well he just got his procedure a bit fucked up and wrong, that's all.

The appropriate action was then taken and he was struck off.

I mean to say, if not like he actually touched up the kids and many Doctors do that all the time by pretending to play the supposed game of "cough and drop" and you don't see the papers all up in arms about that do you?
_________________


Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Ludders



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 2646

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
I'm not on about the body scanners thing specifically, the bit i quoted from your post referred to your defence of Tinklestone's "medical research". Laughing

Well he just got his procedure a bit fucked up and wrong, that's all


Yeah right. Secretly filming people on the toilet was all just for 'research', but he just got his "procedure" a bit wrong.
Good one, Rob! Very Happy I can picture you down the Comedy Club right now. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
RobFilth



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 9013
Location: Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ludders wrote:
RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
I'm not on about the body scanners thing specifically, the bit i quoted from your post referred to your defence of Tinklestone's "medical research". Laughing

Well he just got his procedure a bit fucked up and wrong, that's all


Yeah right. Secretly filming people on the toilet was all just for 'research', but he just got his "procedure" a bit wrong.
Good one, Rob! Very Happy I can picture you down the Comedy Club right now. Laughing

Glad you can see the reasoning.

If Flintstone wanted a good cop a good eyeful of the women and kids nude around his house then he should have just brought out the screen on wheels and ask them to go behind and remove their clothes instead.

Oh and maybe ask them to fill a few specimen jars too.

That would have been the correct procedure for someone of his professional standing.
_________________


Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Ludders



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 2646

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:
Glad you can see the reasoning.


All i see is you practising for your stand-up show. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
TR



Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 204
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
I'm not on about the body scanners thing specifically, the bit i quoted from your post referred to your defence of Tinklestone's "medical research". Laughing

Well he just got his procedure a bit fucked up and wrong, that's all


Yeah right. Secretly filming people on the toilet was all just for 'research', but he just got his "procedure" a bit wrong.
Good one, Rob! Very Happy I can picture you down the Comedy Club right now. Laughing

Glad you can see the reasoning.

If Flintstone wanted a good cop a good eyeful of the women and kids nude around his house then he should have just brought out the screen on wheels and ask them to go behind and remove their clothes instead.



Or he could have gone to live in a nudist colony which is not illegal . I can see Peter Crocker releasing a DVD extra called Nudist Colony In Space .

Or maybe not Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
RobFilth



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 9013
Location: Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ludders wrote:
RobFilth wrote:
Glad you can see the reasoning.


All i see is you practising for your stand-up show. Laughing

Nonsense, I am merely theorising some perfectly logical and coherent explanations for Dr Tinkleplops somewhat unorthodox methodology in the pursuit of his professional practice and understanding.

I'm sure had he diagnosed any usual abnormalities in his ensuing examinations such as (for example) a cancerous haemorrhoid protruding from the colon or indeed blood content from evacuating stools he would have done the right thing and informed his subjects of his concern and subsequently prescribed the right medical treatment from the pharmacist afterwards.

However due to subsequent improper tabloid hysteria and knee jerk reaction, to a man who appears to have been merely thinking outside of the box with his unorthodox preventative measures, we have now most likely lost a perfectly good family General Practitioner in a country where we are literally crying out for such talent.
_________________


Rallying against Rani's Repetitive Rhubarb and Rubbish.


Last edited by RobFilth on Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
monky



Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Posts: 952

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
RobFilth wrote:
Glad you can see the reasoning.


All i see is you practising for your stand-up show. Laughing

Nonsense, I am merely theorising some perfectly logical and coherent explanations for Dr Tinkleplops somewhat unorthodox methodology in the pursuit of his professional practice and understanding.

I'm sure had he diagnosed any usual abnormalities in his ensuing examinations such as (for example) a cancerous haemorrhoid protruding from the colon or indeed blood content from evacuating stools he would have done the right thing and informed his subjects of his concern and subsequently prescribed the right medical treatment from the pharmacist afterwards.

However due to subsequent improper tabloid hysteria and knee jerk reaction, to a man who appears to have been merely thinking outside of the box, we have now most likely lost a perfectly good family General Practitioner in a country where we are literally crying out for such talent.


I wonder if you'd feel different if you were a parent.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message
Ludders



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 2646

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheDarkLord wrote:
RobFilth wrote:
RobFilth wrote:
Ludders wrote:
Well if that image is anything to go by, it's clearly NOT the same as actual film or photographs, which are going to much clearer than a scanner with the kind of woolly definition that you can see there. You can't really see any explicit or graphic images of genitalia.

Those are airbrushed images for the purpose of being able to put on news sites, most news outlets can not display gratuitous genital images.

The paedo-body scanner is detailed enough to give one of the operators a cheap thrill when he snapped one of his colleagues pair of above normal size generous mammaries within the scanner.

Don't believe me?

Check this out:


I need a quick wank now.


The photo is a fake.

Here you go Dark Lord, buy this and you can make your own. Wink

http://www.f1online.de/f1online/index.cfm?location=search&colNo=2274&language=1




I'm tempted. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The Leisure Hive Forum Index -> General Doctor Who Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

© 2007-2008 Informe.com. Get Free Forum Hosting
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
 :: 
BBTech Template by © 2003-04 MDesign